Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Interactivity by Default

Proud to be operating in a Web 2.0 world, I'm continuing to integrate features to make the reading of this blog more interactive, less time consuming, and much more easy to navigate. After del.icio.us and TalkR, here comes Snap :

"Snap Preview Anywhere enables anyone visiting your site to get a glimpse of what other sites you're linking to, without having to leave your site. By rolling over any link, the user gets a visual preview of the site without having to go there, thus eliminating wasted "trips" to linked sites."

Enjoy!

Friday, February 02, 2007

Attack of the Biting UAVs

Remotely controlled unmanned aerial vehicles have been shifting usability from defensive(reconnaissance) to offensive(weapons payload) for the last several years. Working prototypes in the shadows of secrecy reaching yet another long-range flight milestone are setting up the foundations for a different kind of warfare. And while the concept has the potential of saving lifes, and of course taking some while protecting the pilot, it will take several more years before fleets of drones are fully capable of integrating their benefits in the NCW field.
Here's an in-depth article on the evolution of UAVs to UCAVS :

"Robotic air vehicles are beginning to replace some of the Air Force’s manned combat aircraft. Soon, they will be handling a major share of the service’s strike mission. The first steps in this transition already have been taken in the field of fighter-class aircraft. Classified projects now in development seem sure to cut into the manned medium and heavy bomber roles, as well. The Predator MQ-1 is leading this transition. A familiar feature of Air Force combat operations for more than a dozen years, the spindly Predator has evolved dramatically. It is no longer simply a loitering “eye in the sky” but rather a versatile weapon system capable of destroying a couple of ground targets on its own or in collaboration with other aircraft. It is in great demand, and the Air Force is acquiring Predators as fast as it can absorb them. Now in early production is a souped-up version of the Predator, the MQ-9 Reaper. Its combat payload—missiles and bombs carried on underwing hardpoints—roughly equals that of an F-16 fighter. In the Reaper, the Air Force has found a craft that truly combines the powers of a potent strike fighter with the capabilities of a reconnaissance drone."

You may also be curious on why the U.S Department of Agriculture is interested in buying some the way I am -- perhaps a sci-fi insects invasion. What would the next logical evolution of UCAVs be? That's UCAVs capable of electronic warfare attacks, and with their flight durability and flexibility of operation, the idea will receive more acceptance as the technology matures. There's also something else to keep in mind, and that's the interest and active research of various terrorist organizations in UAVs. And while they wouldn't sacrifice $7M for a drone, even be able to get hold of one -- unless Iran supplies -- cheap alternatives such as the Spy X plane are already taken into consideration, at least for reconnaissance purposes. Yes they're cheap, and yes they're easy to jam, you can even hear them coming, but the trend is worth mentioning.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

The TalkRization of My Blog

The service is quite intuitive for a free one, and I must say I never actually got the time to run a podcast on my one, so TalkR seems like the perfect choice for those of you -- including me -- who want to listen to my blog posts. Here's the TalkR feed URL for you to syndicate, and several samples :

- Social Engineering and Malware
- The Life of a Security Threat
- Russia's Lawful Interception of Internet Communications
- Foreign Intelligence Services and U.S Technology Espionage
- Technical Analysis of the Skype Trojan
- Old Media VS New Media

By the way, when was the last time you met a girl who speaks stuff like this?

Old Media VS New Media

The never ending war of corporate interests between the old and the new media, seems to be re-emerging on a weekly basis. Obviously, newspapers don't really like Google picking up their content and making money without giving them any commissions -- they don't even have to -- and with more shortsighted local newspaper unions asking Google and Yahoo! to stop doing so, I'm so looking forward for the moment in the near future when we'll be discussing their will to get crawled again. You fear what you don't understand, and the old media doesn't like the way it got re-intermediated, thus losing its overhyped content generation exclusiveness. In a Web 2.0 world, everyone generates content, which later on gets mixed, re-mixed, syndicated and aggregated, what if newspapers really tried to adapt instead of denying the future? And isn't it ironic that the newspapers that want to be removed from any search engine's index, are later on using these search engines while investigating for their stories?

Here's a lengthy comment I recently made on the old media vs the new one.