Censorship in China - An Open Letter

An open letter to Google's Founders regarding the censorship of search results in China :

"During the National Day holiday week in 2002, when Google.com was blocked in China for the first time, Chinese Google users made an online protest spontaneously. They appealed to free the purer search engine wave by wave. Its seemed its also the first time grassroots power was demonstrated in China on Internet. You can imagine how eager they are to have a complete Internet instead of a shrunken one. At last, people won, Google backed. However, after 4 years, we started to question whether we should continue to support Google. Many users here were disappointed when they found Google.cn filtered many keywords. The compromise remarks by you in Davos made us more frustrated. Seems you are adopting self-censorship which hurts those loyal users a lot which also devalue your motto of "non-evil"."

Issues to keep in mind:
- Yahoo and Microsoft are doing it too in order to continue their business operations in China
- Google is alerting the searcher that the results are filtered because the ghost of Mao is alive and kicking and said so
- Google's losing market share in China's search market next to Sina.com due to censorship concerns, while local users are forgetting that Sina.com too is censoring the results, even worse, not even crawling as deep as Google is in respect to the quality of search results
- U.S Congressman Chris Smith has the issue on his agenda
- Technology companies are seeking government assistance on how to stop the ongoing censorship themselves
- The complete list of censored search results is worth going through
- Google's and Yahoo's shareholders are fighting back
- The Great Firewall is cracking from within with banned journalists now running the largest blogging network in China

She Loves Me, She Loves Me Not

I'm in love, with myself at the first place, and while Saint Valentine's meant to reboot a relationship so to speak, every day should be a Saint Valentine's day in a relationship. Do you trip on love? Malware authors always do around the 14th of February.

Quote of the day - No promises, no demands, love is a battlefield -- or drug like addiction? Via Tech_Space.

Emerging DDoS Attack Trends

In a previous post I emphasized on the long-term trend of how DoS attacks have the potential to cause as much damage as a full-scale DDoS attack, and increase their chance of not getting detected while require less resources. Looks like Prolexic Technologies are thinking in the same direction and warning that :

"IT security bosses will have to be increasingly vigilant in 2007 as criminals exploit new ways of ensuring distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks cause the maximum damage and circumvent filtering technology, according to DDOS protection specialist Prolexic.While there will continue to be large-scale consumption-based attacks this year, attackers have learned that smaller, customised attacks tailored to web servers' application logic can have similar effects but require smaller botnets to generate, according to Prolexic president Keith Laslop."The requests will bring your CPU usage up to 100 percent by doing things like registering as a new customer" he said. "There is a slow frequency of requests so it will not trigger third-party [detection] technology, and intrusion-detection systems are not designed to notice these attacks."

Attacks like these while not conducted by malicious parties, are already happening at Britain's Prime Minister web site, though these should have been anticipated earlier.

As always, assessing risk as if you are a part of a red team provides the best security for your network. Think malicious attackers. If they're able to fingerprint the software running on your boxes and get under the skin of your web applications, a surgical and specifically crafted DoS attack would not only require less resources compared to a DDoS one, but would also make it a little bit harded for incident forensic investigator to react in a timely manner. So while you're preparing for a constant Gbytes stream, attackers will shift tactics.

Here's more info on the recent -- totally futile -- attempt to attack the root domain servers.

Gender Based Censorship in the News Media

Great perspective. The author Dr. Agnes Callamard even got the data to prove it. Limiting the freedom of expression for the sake of securing political or economic investments - so realistic. When it comes to gender based censorship, things have greatly changed during the last decade if you keep an eye on Fortune's Most Powerful Women stats. Sexism is so old-fashioned, and diversity among top management has been taking place for a while, moreover, professional oriented women next to the family oriented ones are increasing -- my type -- but then again if all men are alike, and all women too, look for the exceptions. And by the way, since when does age became a benchmark for a quality point of view or a criteria for knowledge, stereotypes keep you -- the baby boomers -- blindly protected, now aren't they? Trouble is, some evolve faster then you'll ever do, because you are your own benchmark in times when opinionated self-starters make an impact on a daily basis. Success is a state of mind, gender doesn't matter and never did :

"In particular, the results of the GMMP 2005 show and ARTICLE 19’s own work confirms that censorship can be the handmaiden of gender-based power, discrimination and inequality and further, that this type of censorship may be exercised via and by the media. This gender-based censorship is comprised of dynamics that are both systematic and selective in nature, explicit and implicit by expression, intentional and unintentional in outcome and both deliberate and thoughtless in impact. It expresses itself in many shapes, colours, and voices. But ultimately, like all other forms of censorship, it alters reality, dis-empowers, controls, renders invisible, and silences."

I'm still sticking to my point that if girls/women didn't hate each other so much, or let's say be less jealous of one another they could rule the world -- they do rule the world as a matter of fact, but compared to posers media whoring on a daily basis, I'm convinced they're the true puppet masters behind the curtains, now aren't they? Just a thought.