It was about time the freedom of the press and the
democratic nature of joking with politicians takes its hit. But why with
spiritual leaders? The contradictive
Muhammad cartoons sparkled a lot of
anger, and with the recent
tentions in France all we needed was a
hacktivism activity from angry muslims. Remember how the
China vs U.S cyberwar was
sparkled due to the death of a Chinese pilot crashing into an
AWACS that was sort of "keeping it quiet"?
"political reasons"
"just for fun"
"I just want to be the best defacer"
"revenge against that web site"
"patriotism"
tend to dominate. As far as defacements as concerned, in one of my previous posts "
FBI's 2005 Computer Crime Survey - what's to consider?" you can see that according to the report, organizations lost approximately
$10,395M due to web site defacements. Moreover, in some of my previous research on
Cyberterrorism I've indicated the use of script kiddies for
PSYOPS and how such defacements have a favorable psychologic effect on future initiatives.
And while they have the motivation to deface, I wonder would someone strike back and under what justification?
Technorati tags:
security,
information security,
defacement,
Zone-H,
hacktivism,
cyberterrorism,
Muhammad cartoons,
hacking,
Denmark