Terrorism and Response 1990-2005

Very informative and objective retrospective on the response to terrorism from 1990 to 2005. The syllabus by Bruce D. Larkin and Ben Lozano is even more resourceful with its "what if" brainstorming questions.

Here's another map of terrorist networks in America for 1991-2005, based on states and possible cell of operation -- two more previous versions available.

Able Danger's Intelligence Unit Findings Rejected

The much hyped Able Danger Intelligence unit which has supposedly collected and identified information on the 9/11 terrorist attacks claim was officially rejected :

The report found that the recollections of most of the witnesses appeared to focus on a “single chart depicting Al Qaeda cells responsible for pre-9/11 terrorist attacks” that was produced in 1999 by a defense contractor, the Orion Scientific Corporation.

While witnesses remembered having seen Mr. Atta’s photograph or name on such a chart, the inspector general said its investigation showed that the Orion chart did not list Mr. Atta or any of the other Sept. 11 terrorists, and that “testimony by witnesses who claimed to have seen such a chart varied significantly from each other.” The report says that a central witness in the investigation, an active-duty Navy captain who directed the Able Danger program, had changed his account over time, initially telling the inspector general’s office last December that he was “100 percent” certain that he had seen “Mohamed Atta’s image on the chart.”

Issues to keep in mind:
- the chaotic departamental information sharing or the lack of such, budget-deficit arms race, thus departments wanting to get credited for anything ground breaking
- prioritizing is sometimes tricky, wanting to expand a node, thus gather more intelligence and more participants might have resulted in missing the key ones, marginal thinking fully applies
- OSINT as this Social Network Analysis of the 9-11 Terror Network shows, is an invaluable asset and so is the momentum and actual use of the data

Despite that if you don't have a past, you're not going to have a future, true leaders never look into the past, they shape the future and don't mind-tease what they could have done. Necessary evil moves the world in its own orbit now more than ever, and if you really don't have a clue what I'm trying to imply here, then you're still not ready for that mode of thinking.

So, the man who knew, but no one reacted upon his findings in a timely manner, or a case-study of how terrabytes of mixed OSINT and Intelligence data weren't successfully data mined? I go for the first point.

Able Danger chart courtesy of the Center for Cooperative Research.

HP's Surveillance Methods

Seems like it's not just Board of Directors' Phone Records that were obtained by HP under the excuse of enforcing an exemplary corporate citizenship, but on pretty much everyone that communicated with them or is somehow in their circle of friends -- no comments on the boring minutes of meetings shared with the press as the main reason all this. Besides passing the ball to the next board member over who's been aware of, more details on the exact methods used by HP emerge :

- HP obtained phone records for seven current or former HP board members, nine journalists, and their family members;

- HP provided investigators with the Social Security number of one HP employee, in addition the Social Security numbers of 4 journalists, 3 current and former HP board members, and 1 employee were also obtained by investigators;

- HP investigators attempted to use a tracer to track information sent to a reporter;

- The concept of sending misinformation to a reporter and the contents of that email were approved by Mr. Hurd, although no evidence was found to suggest that he approved the use of the tracer for surveillance;

- Investigators hired by HP monitored a board meeting, a trip to Boulder taken by a board member, as well as the board member's spouse and family members;

- In February of 2006, investigators watched a journalist at her residence and in February of 2006 “third party investigators may have conducted a search of an individual’s trash.”

By the time HP provided the associated parties SSNs, they've pretty much left them on the sharks to finish the rest, disinformation though, is something I previously thought they didn't do, but with dumpster diving in place as well, I guess they did order the entire all-in-one surveillance package.

Megacorp ownz your digitally accumulated life, and yes, it can also engineer and snoop on your real one. All they were so talkative about, is publicly available information that every decent analyst should have definitely considered starting from HP's historical performance as a foundation for future speculations. In between HP is (was) also sponsoring a Privacy Innovation Award.

Who's the winner at the bottom line? That's ex-CEO Carly Fiorina -- phone records also obtained -- whose upcoming book will profitably take advantage of the momentum.