data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d126/6d12687cf597c0ed59e4fd643f740f7249c4b403" alt=""
Independent Contractor. Bitcoin: 15Zvie1j8CjSR52doVSZSjctCDSx3pDjKZ Email: dancho.danchev@hush.com OMEMO: ddanchev@conversations.im | OTR: danchodanchev@xmpp.jp | TOX ID: 2E6FCA35A18AA76B2CCE33B55404A796F077CADA56F38922A1988AA381AE617A15D3D3E3E6F1
Monday, September 17, 2007
A Chinese Malware Downloader in the Wild
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d126/6d12687cf597c0ed59e4fd643f740f7249c4b403" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4186b/4186b7fe9915f6134c5d1dddbc032371e01647e0" alt=""
PayPal and Ebay Phishing Domains
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4daa/a4daa243357d613b40c98e4ceb4f49ef4a48ded9" alt=""
paypal-online-account.com
paypal-user-update.com
paypal-support1.com
paypal-account-protection.com
paypal1-login.com
paypal-accounts-update.com
Some "creative" ones to be abused :
paypal-aspx.com
paypal-cgi3.info
paypal-cmd.com
paypal-comlwebscrc-login-run.com
paypal-confirmation-id-0746795.com
And since PayPal is actually EBay after the acqusition, here're some "creative" Ebay domain scams as well :
ebay-com-isapidll.com
ebayisapidll-cgi.com
ebayisapidllaw2.com
ebayisapidllu.com
Authentication itself seems to be a priority as the customer must possess a tangible proof that her transactions' security is somehow enhanced by a layered authentication, no doubt about it. But with phishers actively using a "push" model that is starting to visually social engineer the customers by registering domains imitating PayPal and EBay's web application structure, authentication itself shouldn't be a priority number one the way it is for the time being as phishers are not even trying to bypass it.
Stats courtesy of the Anti-Phishing Working Group.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4186b/4186b7fe9915f6134c5d1dddbc032371e01647e0" alt=""
Storm Worm's DDoS Attitude - Part Two
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/943cd/943cd63cd58c3e9b1497257a0e1e03699511937d" alt=""
"The attacks do show signs of being automated. Certain actions reliably trigger attacks. Investigators who can withstand the onslaught and have decided to test their theories (with cooperation from their ISPs, of course) can reliably trigger DDoS attacks on themselves. In one case, probing more than four unique Peacomm botnet HTTP proxies within ten seconds results in a flood of TCP SYN and ICMP packets, which last for about two hours. That’s all fairly regular."
To me, this tactic is more of a "hey our situational awareness on your actions to shut us down is fairly food enough" type of statement, but why would the botnet masters risk exposing infected hosts compared to the opportunity to have them act like nothing's in fact wrong with them? Mainly because if infected hosts were a scarce resource perhaps they would, but in Storm Worm's case the oversupply of infected hosts is allowing them to dedicate resources for automatic self-defensive DDoS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4186b/4186b7fe9915f6134c5d1dddbc032371e01647e0" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)